Parishes | Schools | Priests | Masses |
More in this section MAIN MENU

A Church in mission or a Church in meetings?

English Spanish George Weigel Profile

On the Solemnity of Christ the King in 2013, Pope Francis completed the work of the 2012 Synod of Bishops with the apostolic exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium (The Joy of the Gospel), issuing a ringing call for the entire Church to “embark on a new chapter of evangelization.” Catholicism, the Pope urged, must move from maintenance to mission: “from a pastoral ministry of mere conservation to a decidedly missionary pastoral ministry.” And that ministry ought to empower all the people of the Church for mission, for the 21st-century Church must understand itself as a “community of missionary disciples” who are “permanently in a state of mission,” because the Church lives not for herself, but “for the evangelization of today’s world.”

A little short of eight years later, Cardinal Mario Grech, general secretary of the Synod of Bishops, unveiled a complex — some might say, convoluted — plan for an extensive series of consultations at the diocesan, national, continental, and international levels in preparation for the Synod on “synodality” to be held in Rome in October 2023.  This two-year process has been described by one enthusiast as “the most important global Catholic project since Vatican II.” My own hunch — based on the U.S. Catholic “Call to Action” process in 1974-76 and the current German “Synodal Path” — is that the only people who will be fully engaged in Cardinal Grech’s multitudinous consultative “phases” before the 2023 Synod are people who love to go to meetings in order to share with like-minded spirits their complaints about The Way Things Are in Catholicism. The rest of the Church, or at least its living parts, will be otherwise occupied, getting about the task to which Pope Francis once summoned all of us: “the evangelization of today’s world.” 

From a Church in mission to a Church in meetings is not a step forward.

That the Church must be in mission, including a mission to poorly catechized Catholics who are drifting away from the faith in droves, ought not be in serious dispute. The pandemic has doubtless accelerated the decline of Catholic practice. But that exodus from the pews was underway before the world ever heard of Wuhan virology labs and COVID-19. The exodus reflects in part the corrosive effects of a culture that, in its kinder moments, may tolerate Catholic faith and practice as a lifestyle choice, but which is adamantly opposed to the notion that Catholicism is the bearer of enduring Gospel truths that lead to personal happiness and social solidarity. The exodus is also a by-product of decades of inept catechesis and flaccid preaching, such that in much of the western world today, the most highly educated Catholics in history likely know less about Catholicism — and therefore believe less — than their grandparents.

Some recent survey data from Italy illustrates the depth of the challenge. In 1995, 41% of those surveyed in Italy professed belief in life after death; 28.6% believe in life after death today. In that same timeframe, the numbers of those who flatly deny that there is life after death almost doubled, from 10.4% to 19.5%. The remainder, presumably, are agnostic on the subject. Think what it means, though, that of these numbers, only three out of 10 Italians firmly believe in life after death.

Anglican biblical scholar N.T. Wright, who has brilliantly defended the historicity of the Resurrection, has also written that there is no evidence whatsoever of any form of early Christianity that did not vigorously affirm that Jesus of Nazareth had been raised to a new and super-abundant form of life — a life available to all those who professed belief in him and lived as his friends and disciples. What was true two millennia ago is true today: If there is no belief in Easter, or in the resurrection to eternal life of those who have died in Christ, there is no Christianity. Period. And if, by that measure, Italy is a post-Christian society and culture, things are likely even more grim in other sectors of what was once western Christendom.

It is not self-evidently clear how two years of self-referential Catholic chatter in pre-synodal Church discussion groups, conducted under the rubric of “discernment” about a “synodal Church,” is going to chart a path beyond this abandonment of rock-bottom Christian beliefs, which is at the root of today’s rapidly declining Catholic practice. This is not the time for a Church in meetings. The times demand a Church in mission, proclaiming Jesus Christ as the answer to the question that is every human life.

George Weigel
Visit blogger's profile >>

Comments from readers

Jose Jimenez - 09/15/2021 06:07 PM
Thank you, this was a very interesting read. I agree that two years of meetings to plan for how meetings will be held is wasteful, but I am more cynical with regards to possible outcomes: this may not just attract people looking for like minded spirits, this could turn into a forum for activists to organize and promote agendas that will further separate the Church from its magisterium and introduce more of the smoke of Satan. Many Catholics have been poorly catechized, and we have to address the causes: Catholic schools at every level need to look, smell, taste, and walk like Catholics schools. Seminaries must focus on solid formation of men for God´s Church. This begins with who is admitted into formation, continues to what is expected of a Catholic seminarian, and ends with what a Catholic priest must be expected to offer in service to the Church. The good news is that there is a hunger and it is being satisfied by religious orders and diocesan seminaries that embrace the Church´s traditions. Traditional orders are growing exponentially, forming solid priests and nuns whose parishes and schools are bursting at the seams. There is hope, we have the answer: lex orandi lex credendi,lex vivendi. We need to get going on the orandi and the rest will follow.
Thania - 09/14/2021 07:02 PM
Me ha sorprendido este artículo que grita que muchos católicos prefieren ver con conformismo el alejamiento de los hombres y mujeres de la fe. No será que no queremos ver por qué andamos mal? Creo que este proceso de reuniones que tratan de entender que pasa es parte del “ver, juzgar, actuar”. Cómo llegaremos a la sinodalidad si no somos capaces de escuchar el grito de los pobres? Soy una mujer sencilla, sin una sólida preparación teológica, pero muy interesada en que a todos llegue la buena nueva del Reino. Creo que este proceso de “reuniones” es un proceso de misión que le debemos a todos.
Rafael Maria Calvo Forte - 09/13/2021 10:24 AM
Gracias, hermano, por sacar este tema a colación. Como bautizado no me sorprende lo que ud. ha descrito acertada y brillantemente; me duele, eso sí. Pero todo lo que enumera, según mi criterio, se deba a la falta de predicación por parte de la mayoría de los clérigos, dicho por San Agustín: Pastores que se predican a sí mismos…,otros hacen cuentecitos o anécdotas personales y hasta narrar un partido de pelota. En alguna ocasión, una dulzona y descafeinada “ homilia” infantil. Carequésis? Raquítica y rápida ( para que no se vayan). Si es así, que se vayan. Tienen miedo a confrontarse y confrontar con la palabra. Da dolor, sí. Este es el reto que tenemos. Sí hay clérigos comprometidos con su misión y vocación, también laicos de altura, pero escasean y a otros, les cierran la boca, porque “ no conviene escucharlos”. Oremos con confianza, sabiendo que en esta tempestad Jesús está en la popa de nuestro barco. Dios nos libre de los visionarios, iluminados y buscadores de recetas devocionales.

Let's Talk Blog

Meet the Bloggers