Blog Published

Blog_101155043516


“If we may borrow the language of the theory of evolution, it (the Resurrection of Jesus) is the greatest ‘mutation,’ absolutely the most crucial leap into a totally new dimension that there has ever been in the long history of life and its development: a leap into a completely new order which does concern us and concerns the whole of history.”

This is an excerpt from Pope Benedict XVI’s Easter Vigil sermon in 2006. A few days later, John Allen, a commentator from National Catholic Reporter, cited this as an example of the surprises (that take your breath away) which Pope Benedict occasionally provides.
In fact, it is not a surprising statement to those who know of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger’s longstanding interest in the question of evolution. Many Catholics don’t know the Church’s position on evolution. They do know that in the United States some of the Christian denominations have taken a strong stance against teaching evolution in the public schools.

In this blog, I will try to summarize some key moments in the development of the Catholic Church’s position on the issue of evolution. My intention is not to make an argument for or against evolution or a theology based on evolution, but simply to share with our readers the (perhaps, to many, surprising) history of the Church’s position.

In August 1950, Pius XII issued a “truce” in the encyclical, Humani Generis, leaving the question of the origin of individual living species to the competence of research in the natural sciences, with the proviso that man cannot be explained solely in terms of biological factors. As a living being endowed with a soul, each one is a new beginning that cannot be derived from biological precursors.

At about the same time, the Jesuit paleontologist, Teilhard de Cardin, attempted to integrate science and theology in his vision of the Cosmic Christ. His new vision became very popular. Most of his writings were not published until after his death because his superiors told him not to publish. His was a mystic’s vision which has greatly enriched the conversation.

In l985, a symposium was hosted by the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under the direction of its prefect, Cardinal Ratzinger. In his preface to the collection of papers from that symposium, he made a distinction between the scientific theory of evolution and a philosophical stance which interprets everything through the lens of evolution:

“Whereas faith today no longer has any difficulty in allowing the scientific hypothesis of evolution to develop in peace according to its own methods, the absolute claim of the philosophical explanatory model ‘evolution’ is an all the more radical challenge to faith and theology.”

In October 1996, Pope John Paul II sent a message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. He said: “In order to mark out the limits of their own proper fields, theologians and those working on the exegesis of the Scripture need to be well informed regarding the results of the latest scientific research…Today, some new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than an hypothesis.”

In July 2005, Cardinal Christophe Shönborn, the Archbishop of Vienna, published an
op-ed piece in The New York Times which created considerable controversy because
it was interpreted as a step back from the Church’s acceptance of evolution. In fact, the cardinal intended only to take issue with evolutionists who deny an innate direction in evolution and use evolution as the hermeneutic lens through which every issue is addressed. He corrected this misunderstanding in his book, “Change or Purpose? Creation, Evolution and a Rational Faith”, published in English in 2009. In this book he expressed his deep admiration for Teilhard’s vision of a numinous (or mystical)
cosmic creation.

In 2006, Pope Benedict XVI, continuing a long tradition of gathering some of his doctoral students together for exchange of papers and discussion, invited his former students to Castel Gandolfo to discuss the issue of evolution. Some of the papers from that conference were published in English in 2009 as “Creation and Evolution”.

It is one thing to be open to the science of evolution, but another thing to develop a theology which successfully integrates that concept into the magisterium (teaching authority of the Church). Although a number of Catholic theologians are engaged in that effort now, to my knowledge none of these have received a seal of approval from the Vatican. However, recently Pope Benedict indicated that it is time to look again at the thinking of Teilhard de Chardin.

On July 24, 2009, the pope made a surprising allusion to Teilhard during a vespers service. According to John Allen, the pope said: “It's the great vision that later Teilhard de Chardin also had: At the end we will have a true cosmic liturgy, where the cosmos becomes a living host.”

Allen continued: “At the very least, the line seemed to offer a blessing for exploration of the late Jesuit’s ideas. That impression appeared to be confirmed by the Vatican spokesperson, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, who said afterward, ‘By now, no one would dream of saying that [Teilhard] is a heterodox author who shouldn't be studied.’”


Brother Richard DeMaria, CFC
Executive Director, Ministry of Christian Formation

READ MORE:


Comments from readers

Richard DeMaria - 09/19/2009 02:17 PM
Eric:
I hope that another participant will be able to answer your questions. I don't know the earlier history of the Church and evolution, but would like, as would you, to know more . Richard
Antonio Fernandez - 09/19/2009 10:51 AM
I'm not a theologian or a scientist like most of those who have shared their opinions about the excellent article by Brother DeMaria; however, I would like to share with this group my humble, very simplistic and in no way supported thought. I'm convinced that in the Creation of the world there was an imperative need of the action of God in three moments:

1) In the emptyness of space there was a need for an extraordinary and ever existing force (God) to bring energy and matter into the universe.

2) At a given moment a particle of inanimated matter was transformed from lifeless to one being full of life (animal and/or plant).

3) At the end of an "evolution" process a given animal or whatever other life- or lifeless-form was used, there was a leap into the begining of the human beings as God blew the breath of life (soul) into these new creatures.

What happened between these moments, I don't think the Church gives us currently any final word. That's up to the scientists as long as they do not affirm that the universe was the mere result of just the forces of nature without having a personal God that planned it.

I hope no one is offended for my bringing your discussion to this unscientific level.
Eric Giunta - 09/18/2009 04:06 PM
I would love for someone to synthesize Catholic reaction to evolutionary theory before the pontificate of Pius XII. I began reading Amir Aczel's "The Jesuit and the Skull: Evolution, and the Search for Peking Man", and eventually threw it in the trash, as the author seemed to be bent on anti-Christian "faith v. science" invective. Intelligent critique is one thing, undocumented accusation another. Dr. Aczel was very insistent that the Catholic Church was anti-evolution from the get-go.

I also have yet to come across a straight-forward explanation of what Fathers such as Augustine of Hippo taught on the subject. I believe along with Gregory of Nyssa, he had speculated the original life forms "planted" in the Garden by God were not created in precisely the form they are today, and had undergone some kind of . . . "evolution"? I am curious as to his Scriptural and philosophical basis for such speculation.
Richard DeMaria - 09/17/2009 08:33 AM
A.G. Mendive: To make sense of a theory of evolution with its history of pain and suffering, the Christian would need to complement it with the Christian theology of suffering and its redeptive value.

Michael Kramer: Thank you for identifying key church documents concerning Teilhard de Chardin. They complete the history and I will include them in any future presentation I do on this topic (which does not have the space limitations of this blog format).

I also agree that we should wait for more clarification on what Benedict actually said about Teilhard and what he intended by his remark. The precedent which you provide in the case of the letter to Cardinal Poupard and how that letter was mis-understood by the popular press should cause me not to rely upon third party sources so cavalierly.
A.G. Mendive - 09/15/2009 07:26 AM
I think about evolution and creationism and I don�t find any difficulty in accepting both. There are things though that I would love for someone to explain to me. For example: If the instinct for self-preservation is a predominant if not the predominant one in the animal world, why does the female of the species become pregnant? You would think that she makes her life so much harder; after all, she is the one that normally has to raise them, feed them, and protect them. However, they appear to be imprinted with the need to carry out that function even though it obviously affects them in a negative way. It would then seem that this drive is imprinted in them, like a computer program. The question then is who was the programmer?
Kathleen Deignan, CND - 09/14/2009 09:16 PM
What a wonderfully condensed and helpful summary of the development of thought in our tradition on the subject of evolution. Thanks so much. KD
Michael Kramer - 09/14/2009 01:21 PM
Fr. Teilhard de Chardin was forbidden from writing under Pope Pius XII by his Jesuit Superiors.
Indeed Pius XII's Encyclical Humani Generis condemns Teilhard's work by teaching explicitly the opposite of that taught by Fr. Teilhard de Chardin.

WARNINGS REGARDING THE WRITINGS OF FATHER TEILHARD DE CHARDIN
Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Under Blessed Pope John XXIII:

On June 30, 1962, the Holy Office issued a monitum (warning) regarding the writings of Father Teilhard de Chardin. In 1981 the Holy See reiterated this warning against rumors that it no longer applied. Following is the text of both the monitum and the 1981 statement:
Admonition

"Several works of Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, some of which were posthumously published, are being edited and are gaining a good deal of success.

"Prescinding from a judgement about those points that concern the positive sciences, it is sufficiently clear that the above-mentioned works abound in such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic doctrine.

"For this reason, the most eminent and most revered Fathers of the Holy Office exhort all Ordinaries as well as the superiors of Religious institutes, rectors of seminaries and presidents of universities, effectively to protect the minds, particularly of the youth, against the dangers presented by the works of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin and of his followers.

"Given at Rome, from the palace of the Holy Office, on the thirtieth day of June, 1962.

Sebastianus Masala, Notarius"


''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Under the Servant of God Pope John Paul II whose Prefect for the competent Congregation (of the Doctrine of the Faith) is now the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI

Communiqu� of the Press Office of the Holy See (appearing in the English edition of L'Osservatore Romano, July 20, 1981)

"The letter sent by the Cardinal Secretary of State to His Excellency Mons. Poupard on the occasion of the centenary of the birth of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin has been interpreted in a certain section of the press as a revision of previous stands taken by the Holy See in regard to this author, and in particular of the Monitum of the Holy Office of 30 June 1962, which pointed out that the work of the author contained ambiguities and grave doctrinal errors.

"The question has been asked whether such an interpretation is well founded.

"After having consulted the Cardinal Secretary of State and the Cardinal Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which, by order of the Holy Father, had been duly consulted beforehand, about the letter in question, we are in a position to reply in the negative. Far from being a revision of the previous stands of the Holy See, Cardinal Casaroli's letter expresses reservation in various passages�and these reservations have been passed over in silence by certain newspapers�reservations which refer precisely to the judgement given in the Monitum of June 1962, even though this document is not explicitly mentioned."

_________________________________________________________

It is therefore abundantly clear that the Holy See wishes to express that this man wrote things that at the very least can lead to opinions contrary to the absolute truths of the Faith. The Encyclical Humani Generis of Pope Pius XII, referenced by the good brother is one that can be read to understand the teaching of the Church on the matter. The writings of Teilhard according to our Popes, including Pope Benedict XVI, without the interpretations of Father Lombardi and John Allen, are to be received with caution if they are received at all. Better that they not be received for as we know, he who plays with danger shall perish in it.

Powered by Parish Mate | E-system

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply